Let’s get this out of the way right up front. A contract is a contract. When Snapple bought Dr. Pepper, the folks in Dublin, Texas weren’t supposed to sell their special concoction, sweetened with pure cane sugar instead of high fructose corn syrup, beyond a six-county territory within 40 miles of the plant. And they weren’t supposed to add “Dublin” to the Dr. Pepper trademark. I preach from my soapbox a lot about maintaining the integrity of the brand, so I see Snapple’s point of view. Looks like the contract was violated on both counts. With the resolution to the dispute announced on Jan. 11, everyone’s supposed to move on.
Problem. Branding problem. Big branding problem.
Consumers have taken control of Snapple’s brand and rubbed their noses in the mess. According to Bud Kennedy at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Bonnell’s will no longer serve the brand formerly known as Dublin Dr. Pepper, even though the same product will still be available sans the Dublin moniker. Other establishments are following suit. Consumers are protesting with their taste buds as well, vowing to boycott not just Dr. Pepper but all Snapple products. That includes Snapple, 7UP, Mott’s, Canada Dry, A&W Root Bear, Clamato, Country Time, Orange Crush, Deja Blue, Diet Rite, Hawaiian Punch, Hires, Margaritaville, and more. (They may have to work real hard to avoid all Snapple products.) I’d say what we have here is a tarnished brand.
If we could re-wind that tape, there are a few branding principles I’d want Snapple to understand about the Dublin Dr. Pepper phenomenon.
First, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group should understand that Dublin DP was about so much more than a soft drink, more than a trademark. It had the hearts and minds of loyal imbibers that went beyond mere taste. Let’s look at some of the attributes of the brand.
Mystique: A positive aura surrounded the Dublin Dr. Pepper name. The little bitty bottling plant managed to stick to its guns, refusing to bow to the cheaper, less tasty god of high fructose corn syrup. It’s a David and Goliath story. We like the little guy with the little slingshot and the little pebble. Do you get that, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group?
Nostalgia: The Dublin folks continued to use the old bottles we baby boomers grew up with. How fun it was to sip your DP from a faded 10-2-4 container! (Remember when they got you to drink more by saying you needed a picker-upper three times a day?) A day trip to Dublin to pick up a case or two enhanced the experience as you drove through the Texas countryside to reach your destination. And if you didn’t grow up pouring a pack of salted Planter’s peanuts into your DP, well, you’ve missed something. Maybe it’s an acquired taste, but it’s a memory I cherish. Snapple, did you ever bother to understand that memories were part of the brand?
Exclusivity: You couldn’t find Dublin Dr. Pepper just anywhere. Even when the small town bottlers wrongly went beyond the 40-mile circumference that defined their distribution territory, it was still something you had to hunt down with a purpose. That’s why we made pilgrimages down Highway 67 to get our own stash. Inconvenient? Sure. But it’s part of the experience. What kind of experience will you provide your customers, Mr. Snapple?
So if the former Dublin Dr. Pepper brand enjoyed mystique, nostalgia and exclusivity as important brand attributes, what brand attributes are now identified with Snapple, the “winner” of this dispute? How about “bully?” How about “clueless?” Remember, the consumer is the one who has the final say on what your brand is about.
Understanding the loyalty of Dublin Dr. Pepper fans early on in negotiations could have led to a very different outcome. Being known as the corporate giant who obliterated 14 highly valued jobs at a tiny bottling plant in a small rural community does not win friends. I doubt that Snapple will suffer much from the debacle, but Texans have a long memory, and the corporate giant will need to be working on damage control for some time to come. I’m thinking, Mr. Snapple, you didn’t really win.

